fbpx
  1. EnCO2re
  2. EnCO2re
  3. Monday, 12 December 2016
If CO2 can be successfully shared between ‘producer’ and ‘donor’ industries to the economic benefit of both parties, and reducing environmental impacts, is there an argument that targets for organisations to reduce their emissions should be altered or reduced?


This discussion is part of the learning nugget CO2 re-use value chain in the first module of Introduction to CO2 Re-use course.
References
  1. http://learning.climate-kic.org/courses/enco2re-info
Comment
There are no comments made yet.
Accepted Answer Pending Moderation
0
Votes
Undo
Carbon inside the form of CO2 and methane is emitted by volcanoes, through rotting flora and other organic be counted. But CO2 is sequestered, or absorbed, with the aid of bushes their roots, branches, trunks, and leaves are about 50 percent carbon, plankton, soils and water in our bodies.
  Marylebone, London, UK
Visit 
Comment
There are no comments made yet.
  1. more than a month ago
  2. EnCO2re
  3. # 1
Accepted Answer Pending Moderation
0
Votes
Undo
This segment additionally considers the present and future possible market size of both the current and developing CO2 reuse technologies so as to instruct the long-term CO2 usage potential and to decide whether amounts are probably going to be similar with the emissions produced from control plants or other expansive modern sources.
Comment
  1. Lauren desouza
  2. 3 months ago
  3. #779
Glad to read some useful stuff here. Thanks.
There are no comments made yet.
  1. more than a month ago
  2. EnCO2re
  3. # 2
  • Page :
  • 1


There are no replies made for this post yet.
Be one of the first to reply to this post!